PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESC.DE achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than XNDX.DE's 20.67% return.


XESC.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
4.61%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.63%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.49%

XNDX.DE

1D
-0.82%
1M
9.31%
YTD
20.67%
6M
19.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XESC.DE and XNDX.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XNDX.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XESC.DEXNDX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XESC.DEXNDX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.53

-0.20

Drawdowns

XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESC.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than XNDX.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESC.DE and XNDX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESC.DEXNDX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.38%

-20.11%

-25.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.82%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-10.66%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

Volatility

XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESC.DEXNDX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

31.84%

-15.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

31.84%

-14.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

31.84%

-13.57%

XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESC.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XNDX.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XESC.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Dividend Comparison

XESC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XNDX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.19%
XNDX.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD
0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XESC.DE and XNDX.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XNDX.DE.

XESC.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XNDX.DE is Nasdaq-100. XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while XNDX.DE tracks Nasdaq 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESC.DE and 0.18% for XNDX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESC.DE and XNDX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer