PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and Expat Romania BET UCITS ETF (ROX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESC.DE achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than ROX.DE's 39.19% return.


XESC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.14%
6M
6.37%
YTD
10.61%
1Y
19.76%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
11.07%

ROX.DE

1D
0.49%
1M
15.08%
6M
23.72%
YTD
39.19%
1Y
72.38%
3Y*
35.94%
5Y*
23.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
10.61%22.24%11.06%22.50%-8.87%23.54%-2.88%30.09%-10.48%
ROX.DE
Expat Romania BET UCITS ETF
39.19%43.69%13.19%22.15%-3.87%34.78%-1.71%34.41%-15.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XESC.DE and ROX.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2018

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ROX.DE
ROX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ROX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ROX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and Expat Romania BET UCITS ETF (ROX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XESC.DEROX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.62

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

9.10

-7.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.37

28.32

-21.95

XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the ROX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESC.DE and ROX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESC.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.74%, which is greater than ROX.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESC.DE and ROX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESC.DEROX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.74%

-29.00%

-17.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-7.91%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-17.52%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

-19.51%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

0.00%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-5.26%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.55%

+0.56%

Volatility

XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) is 3.98%, while Expat Romania BET UCITS ETF (ROX.DE) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that XESC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESC.DEROX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

5.07%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

13.79%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

19.33%

-3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.55%

19.80%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

21.02%

-3.11%

XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESC.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ROX.DE's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

XESC.DE vs. ROX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XESC.DE nor ROX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XESC.DE and ROX.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for ROX.DE.

XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while ROX.DE tracks BET Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Expat. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESC.DE and 1.38% for ROX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESC.DE and ROX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer