PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEQT.TO vs. HEQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEQT.TO is traded in CAD, while HEQT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HEQT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than HEQT's 6.29% return.


XEQT.TO

1D
0.83%
1M
6.02%
YTD
13.22%
6M
11.68%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*

HEQT

1D
0.00%
1M
3.42%
YTD
6.29%
6M
5.04%
1Y
16.65%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
13.22%19.47%24.36%17.25%-11.01%1.33%
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
6.36%5.03%28.46%14.04%-1.71%4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and HEQT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.60

The correlation between XEQT.TO and HEQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEQT.TO
HEQT

Technology

22.9%
36.2%

Financial Services

20.3%
11.9%

Industrials

12.1%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
10.1%

Basic Materials

7.3%
1.8%

Energy

7.2%
3.5%

Healthcare

6.6%
8.4%

Communication Services

6.4%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.9%

Utilities

2.8%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.9%

Technology

XEQT.TO
22.9%
HEQT
36.2%

Financial Services

XEQT.TO
20.3%
HEQT
11.9%

Industrials

XEQT.TO
12.1%
HEQT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XEQT.TO
7.8%
HEQT
10.1%

Basic Materials

XEQT.TO
7.3%
HEQT
1.8%

Energy

XEQT.TO
7.2%
HEQT
3.5%

Healthcare

XEQT.TO
6.6%
HEQT
8.4%

Communication Services

XEQT.TO
6.4%
HEQT
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

XEQT.TO
4.4%
HEQT
4.9%

Utilities

XEQT.TO
2.8%
HEQT
2.3%

Real Estate

XEQT.TO
2.2%
HEQT
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQT
HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEQT.TOHEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.49

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.13

12.15

+3.98

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the HEQT Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEQT.TO and HEQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEQT.TOHEQTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.37

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

1.48

-0.52

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, which is greater than HEQT's maximum drawdown of -11.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and HEQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEQT.TOHEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.74%

-11.75%

-17.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-4.79%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

-11.75%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-2.46%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.37%

+0.52%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) at 1.06%. This indicates that XEQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEQT.TOHEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

1.06%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

5.59%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

7.05%

+4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

8.08%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

8.08%

+7.48%

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HEQT's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than HEQT's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
1.19%1.19%1.29%4.10%3.94%0.27%0.00%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.47%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEQT.TO and HEQT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HEQT.

XEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while HEQT is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XEQT.TO and 0.53% for HEQT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and HEQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer