PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -30.77% return.


XEQT.TO

1D
0.63%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.73%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*

HBIX.NEO

1D
3.78%
1M
-21.97%
YTD
-30.77%
6M
-32.37%
1Y
-42.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
12.26%21.19%
HBIX.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF
-30.77%-9.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and HBIX.NEO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIX.NEO
HBIX.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEQT.TOHBIX.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.87

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

-0.77

+4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

-1.33

+16.74

XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEQT.TO and HBIX.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, smaller than the maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown of -57.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and HBIX.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEQT.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.74%

-57.09%

+27.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-57.09%

+48.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-54.15%

+53.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-24.75%

+20.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

32.88%

-30.96%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) is 5.02%, while Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) has a volatility of 14.38%. This indicates that XEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBIX.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEQT.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

14.38%

-9.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

41.42%

-31.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

52.20%

-40.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

51.19%

-37.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

51.19%

-35.61%

XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than HBIX.NEO's 45.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HBIX.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF
45.75%20.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.48%1.66%2.03%2.09%2.14%1.66%1.69%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEQT.TO and HBIX.NEO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.

XEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while HBIX.NEO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XEQT.TO and 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and HBIX.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer