PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEON.DE vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEON.DE vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEON.DE is traded in EUR, while GLDM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEON.DE achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -4.45% return.


XEON.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
6M
1.00%
YTD
1.07%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
0.74%
ALL TIME*
0.67%

GLDM

1D
-0.02%
1M
-4.61%
6M
-11.20%
YTD
-4.45%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
25.65%
5Y*
17.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEON.DE vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XEON.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C
1.07%2.25%3.78%3.30%-0.04%-0.58%-0.57%-0.49%-0.24%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-4.45%44.72%35.47%9.65%5.70%3.17%14.79%20.76%3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XEON.DE and GLDM is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEON.DE vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEON.DE
XEON.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEON.DE vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEON.DEGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+20.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.50

1.18

+3.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

69.40

0.92

+68.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

324.72

2.16

+322.56

XEON.DE vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio is 9.13, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEON.DE and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEON.DE vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEON.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.71%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -23.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEON.DE and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEON.DEGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-23.80%

+20.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-23.80%

+23.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.08%

-23.80%

+23.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.64%

-23.80%

+23.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-23.08%

+23.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-5.51%

+4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

10.10%

-10.09%

Volatility

XEON.DE vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) is 0.04%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that XEON.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEON.DEGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.04%

5.83%

-5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

22.39%

-22.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

26.15%

-25.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.25%

17.01%

-16.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

15.82%

-15.43%

XEON.DE vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XEON.DE and GLDM have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEON.DE vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither XEON.DE nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XEON.DE and GLDM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEON.DE and GLDM have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

XEON.DE is categorized as Money Market, while GLDM is Gold. XEON.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEON.DE and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer