PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEMD vs. 0QMG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XEMD vs. 0QMG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Swiss Life Holding AG (0QMG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XEMD vs. 0QMG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
-0.24%13.98%8.77%10.26%1.82%
0QMG.L
Swiss Life Holding AG
-3.87%55.57%17.27%41.15%7.33%
Different Trading Currencies

XEMD is traded in USD, while 0QMG.L is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the 0QMG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than 0QMG.L's -3.87% return.


XEMD

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
3.46%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
10.20%
5Y*
10Y*

0QMG.L

1D
2.95%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
-3.87%
6M
3.44%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
27.75%
5Y*
22.86%
10Y*
20.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEMD vs. 0QMG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMD
XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

0QMG.L
0QMG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
0QMG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0QMG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
0QMG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
0QMG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
0QMG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMD vs. 0QMG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Swiss Life Holding AG (0QMG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEMD0QMG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.12

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

1.62

+1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.24

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.14

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.31

5.46

+7.85

XEMD vs. 0QMG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the 0QMG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD and 0QMG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEMD0QMG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.12

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.97

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD and 0QMG.L is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XEMD vs. 0QMG.L - Dividend Comparison

XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than 0QMG.L's 3.98% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
6.06%6.15%6.30%6.19%3.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
0QMG.L
Swiss Life Holding AG
3.98%3.83%4.72%5.14%5.22%3.73%4.83%0.51%3.57%3.19%2.95%2.70%

Drawdowns

XEMD vs. 0QMG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum 0QMG.L drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and 0QMG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XEMD0QMG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-49.94%

+39.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-13.38%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-5.67%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-7.03%

+5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

5.69%

-4.85%

Volatility

XEMD vs. 0QMG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 2.45%, while Swiss Life Holding AG (0QMG.L) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0QMG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XEMD0QMG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

7.42%

-4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

14.15%

-10.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

23.48%

-17.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

21.73%

-14.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.94%

24.33%

-17.39%