PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEMC.TO vs. AVXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

XEMC.TO is traded in CAD, while AVXC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVXC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMC.TO achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than AVXC's 7.52% return.


XEMC.TO

1D
4.21%
1M
-8.58%
YTD
9.76%
6M
18.13%
1Y
41.69%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
10Y*

AVXC

1D
3.67%
1M
-8.44%
YTD
7.52%
6M
14.37%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMC.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMC.TO
XEMC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XEMC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEMC.TOAVXCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

2.03

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.64

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

2.99

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.76

10.88

+0.88

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMC.TO and AVXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEMC.TOAVXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.03

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

1.20

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between XEMC.TO and AVXC is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

XEMC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than AVXC's 1.89% yield.


TTM202520242023
XEMC.TO
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.26%2.48%2.28%1.67%
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
1.89%1.97%1.34%0.00%

Drawdowns

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMC.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.55%, smaller than the maximum AVXC drawdown of -15.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMC.TO and AVXC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XEMC.TOAVXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-20.44%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-14.04%

+0.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

-10.78%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-3.92%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.36%

+0.20%

Volatility

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) at 10.47%. This indicates that XEMC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XEMC.TOAVXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.60%

10.47%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.49%

14.32%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.90%

18.42%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

15.95%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

15.95%

-1.34%