PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEMC.TO vs. AVXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEMC.TO is traded in CAD, while AVXC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVXC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMC.TO achieves a 43.62% return, which is significantly higher than AVXC's 35.77% return.


XEMC.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
14.95%
YTD
43.62%
6M
46.03%
1Y
79.31%
3Y*
29.96%
5Y*
10Y*

AVXC

1D
-1.04%
1M
12.83%
YTD
35.77%
6M
37.64%
1Y
64.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XEMC.TO
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
43.62%28.28%4.62%
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
35.77%25.42%5.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XEMC.TO and AVXC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

0.88

The correlation between XEMC.TO and AVXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMC.TO
XEMC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XEMC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEMC.TOAVXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.62

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.08

5.20

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.21

19.65

+3.55

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is comparable to the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMC.TO and AVXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEMC.TOAVXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85

3.36

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.83

1.78

+0.04

Drawdowns

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMC.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.55%, smaller than the maximum AVXC drawdown of -15.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMC.TO and AVXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEMC.TOAVXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-15.71%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-12.47%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-1.04%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-2.41%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.29%

+0.14%

Volatility

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) have volatilities of 9.10% and 8.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEMC.TOAVXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

8.88%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.42%

17.08%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

19.31%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

17.21%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

17.21%

-1.47%

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMC.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEMC.TO vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

XEMC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than AVXC's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
1.49%1.97%1.34%0.00%
XEMC.TO
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
1.72%2.48%2.28%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEMC.TO and AVXC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEMC.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEMC.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVXC.

XEMC.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVXC is Emerging Markets Diversified. XEMC.TO tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index (Net), while AVXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets IMI. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis Investors. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XEMC.TO and 0.33% for AVXC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEMC.TO and AVXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer