XEM.TO vs. CAEM.TO
XEM.TO (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF) and CAEM.TO (Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. XEM.TO is passively managed, while CAEM.TO is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
XEM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XEM.TO
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 11.30%
- YTD
- 29.23%
- 6M
- 29.57%
- 1Y
- 57.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
CAEM.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 9.77%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XEM.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 22.85% |
CAEM.TO Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 17.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEM.TO and CAEM.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEM.TO vs. CAEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XEM.TO
CAEM.TO
XEM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) and Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF (CAEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEM.TO | CAEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.00 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEM.TO | CAEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 7.86 | -7.42 |
Drawdowns
XEM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.29%, which is greater than CAEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEM.TO and CAEM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEM.TO | CAEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.29% | -4.26% | -31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.87% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -0.74% | -9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | — | — |
Volatility
XEM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEM.TO | CAEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.28% | 19.42% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 19.42% | -2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 19.42% | -1.30% |
Dividends
XEM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while CAEM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAEM.TO Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEM.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 1.47% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 1.91% | 1.28% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEM.TO and CAEM.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and CIBC.
Find the right allocation for XEM.TO and CAEM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer