XEM.TO vs. VFV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO).
XEM.TO and VFV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEM.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar EM GR CAD. It was launched on Jun 18, 2009. VFV.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2012. Both XEM.TO and VFV.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XEM.TO or VFV.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XEM.TO and VFV.TO is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XEM.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XEM.TO:
1.52
VFV.TO:
2.39
XEM.TO:
2.20
VFV.TO:
3.34
XEM.TO:
1.28
VFV.TO:
1.44
XEM.TO:
0.91
VFV.TO:
3.75
XEM.TO:
6.22
VFV.TO:
16.91
XEM.TO:
3.21%
VFV.TO:
1.69%
XEM.TO:
13.19%
VFV.TO:
11.93%
XEM.TO:
-35.27%
VFV.TO:
-27.43%
XEM.TO:
-6.36%
VFV.TO:
-2.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEM.TO achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, XEM.TO has underperformed VFV.TO with an annualized return of 4.16%, while VFV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.
XEM.TO
6.06%
4.20%
9.34%
18.76%
3.92%
4.16%
VFV.TO
1.31%
-2.16%
13.02%
26.11%
15.67%
14.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XEM.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEM.TO has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XEM.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XEM.TO
VFV.TO
XEM.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XEM.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than VFV.TO's 0.98% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEM.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 1.96% | 2.08% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 1.91% | 1.28% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.22% | 2.15% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.98% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
XEM.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEM.TO and VFV.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XEM.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) have volatilities of 3.22% and 3.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.