XEM.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO).
XEM.TO and XEQT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEM.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar EM GR CAD. It was launched on Jun 18, 2009. XEQT.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Aug 7, 2019. Both XEM.TO and XEQT.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XEM.TO or XEQT.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XEM.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XEM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XEM.TO:
1.37
XEQT.TO:
2.38
XEM.TO:
2.00
XEQT.TO:
3.35
XEM.TO:
1.25
XEQT.TO:
1.44
XEM.TO:
0.76
XEQT.TO:
3.67
XEM.TO:
5.64
XEQT.TO:
16.83
XEM.TO:
3.20%
XEQT.TO:
1.45%
XEM.TO:
13.21%
XEQT.TO:
10.21%
XEM.TO:
-35.27%
XEQT.TO:
-29.74%
XEM.TO:
-9.39%
XEQT.TO:
-1.76%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEM.TO achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 2.94% return.
XEM.TO
2.62%
2.71%
8.49%
18.76%
3.24%
4.04%
XEQT.TO
2.94%
2.12%
14.81%
24.44%
11.38%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XEM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEM.TO has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XEM.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XEM.TO
XEQT.TO
XEM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XEM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEM.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 2.03% | 2.08% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 1.91% | 1.28% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.22% | 2.15% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.97% | 2.03% | 2.09% | 2.14% | 1.65% | 1.68% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XEM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEM.TO and XEQT.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XEM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) have volatilities of 4.05% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.