PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEL vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XEL vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEL achieves a 5.87% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, XEL has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 9.46%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 33.71% annualized return.


XEL

1D
-1.80%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
5.87%
6M
4.05%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
9.46%

LLY

1D
1.57%
1M
21.37%
YTD
7.29%
6M
15.58%
1Y
50.32%
3Y*
38.07%
5Y*
39.75%
10Y*
33.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEL vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEL
Xcel Energy Inc.
5.87%13.89%12.32%-8.67%6.44%4.40%7.77%32.37%5.88%21.91%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
7.29%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XEL and LLY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 1985

0.28

The correlation between XEL and LLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XEL:

$48.59B

LLY:

$1.03T

EPS

XEL:

$3.50

LLY:

$28.14

PE Ratio

XEL:

22.15

LLY:

40.83

PEG Ratio

XEL:

5.71

LLY:

0.82

PS Ratio

XEL:

3.13

LLY:

14.28

PB Ratio

XEL:

2.04

LLY:

33.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

XEL:

$14.78B

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XEL:

$1.88B

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

XEL:

$6.26B

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEL vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEL
XEL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEL vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XELLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.14

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.86

5.32

-1.46

XEL vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEL Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEL and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XELLLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.33

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

1.23

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

1.12

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.58

-0.17

Drawdowns

XEL vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEL drawdown since its inception was -80.64%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEL and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XELLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.64%

-68.24%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-23.64%

+12.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.42%

-34.48%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-34.48%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

-34.48%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

0.00%

-6.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.32%

-19.22%

+7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

9.49%

-5.10%

Volatility

XEL vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) is 7.09%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that XEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XELLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

9.55%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.55%

27.05%

-12.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

38.16%

-18.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

32.54%

-11.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.70%

30.18%

-8.48%

Dividends

XEL vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

XEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than LLY's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.56%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
XEL
Xcel Energy Inc.
2.97%3.83%2.43%3.36%2.78%2.70%2.58%2.55%3.09%2.99%3.34%3.56%

Financials

XEL vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xcel Energy Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
4.02B
19.80B
(XEL) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XEL vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Xcel Energy Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
79.0%
Portfolio components
XEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

XEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xcel Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

XEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a net income of 556.00M and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XEL and LLY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLY has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to XEL (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEL dropped -80.64% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEL and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer