PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEL vs. FDTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEL vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEL achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly lower than FDTS's 18.78% return. Over the past 10 years, XEL has underperformed FDTS with an annualized return of 9.59%, while FDTS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.96% annualized return.


XEL

1D
1.21%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
8.05%
6M
7.01%
1Y
19.86%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
9.59%

FDTS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
18.78%
6M
20.77%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
10.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEL vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEL
Xcel Energy Inc.
8.05%13.89%12.32%-8.67%6.44%4.40%7.77%32.37%5.88%21.91%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
18.78%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XEL and FDTS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEL vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEL
XEL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEL vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XELFDTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.43

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.14

11.78

-7.64

XEL vs. FDTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEL Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FDTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEL and FDTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEL vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEL drawdown since its inception was -80.64%, which is greater than FDTS's maximum drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEL and FDTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XELFDTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.64%

-51.26%

-29.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-12.61%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.42%

-13.19%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-33.11%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

-51.26%

+16.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-4.77%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.32%

-10.64%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

3.66%

+0.79%

Volatility

XEL vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) is 6.90%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that XEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XELFDTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

8.44%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

15.54%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.13%

18.27%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

29.42%

-8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

24.92%

-3.23%

Dividends

XEL vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison

XEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than FDTS's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%
XEL
Xcel Energy Inc.
2.19%3.83%2.43%3.36%2.78%2.70%2.58%2.55%3.09%2.99%3.34%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEL and FDTS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to XEL (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEL dropped -80.64% vs FDTS's -51.26%.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEL and FDTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer