PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBC5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XEIN.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.45%
6M
1.64%
YTD
2.76%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
1.88%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
1.37%

IBC5.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.74%
6M
-0.19%
YTD
-0.00%
1Y
1.13%
3Y*
1.66%
5Y*
-1.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XEIN.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.76%0.88%-0.23%5.58%-9.52%6.29%2.73%6.38%-1.32%
IBC5.DE
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.00%4.47%0.00%1.38%-14.33%4.96%9.71%5.53%-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between XEIN.DE and IBC5.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018

0.49

The correlation between XEIN.DE and IBC5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEIN.DE
XEIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XEIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

IBC5.DE
IBC5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IBC5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBC5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEIN.DEIBC5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.05

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

0.51

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

1.10

+3.01

XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the IBC5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEIN.DE and IBC5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.30%, smaller than the maximum IBC5.DE drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEIN.DE and IBC5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEIN.DEIBC5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.30%

-18.53%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-2.19%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.33%

-5.06%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-18.53%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.99%

-10.18%

+4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-7.05%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

1.03%

-0.33%

Volatility

XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBC5.DE) have volatilities of 0.93% and 0.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEIN.DEIBC5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.96%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

3.07%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

4.20%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

6.25%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

6.30%

-0.15%

XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEIN.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBC5.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEIN.DE vs. IBC5.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XEIN.DE nor IBC5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XEIN.DE and IBC5.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBC5.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBC5.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XEIN.DE.

XEIN.DE tracks iBoxx Euro Inflation-Linked Index, while IBC5.DE tracks Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XEIN.DE and 0.12% for IBC5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEIN.DE and IBC5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer