PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBC5.DE) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (CBUL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBC5.DE achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than CBUL.DE's 0.78% return.


IBC5.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.37%
6M
0.56%
YTD
0.37%
1Y
1.69%
3Y*
1.86%
5Y*
-1.21%
10Y*

CBUL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.46%
6M
0.78%
YTD
0.78%
1Y
1.66%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBC5.DE
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.37%4.47%0.00%1.38%-10.41%
CBUL.DE
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
0.78%3.87%3.10%2.21%-3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IBC5.DE and CBUL.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between IBC5.DE and CBUL.DE has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBC5.DE
IBC5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IBC5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUL.DE
CBUL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CBUL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBC5.DE) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (CBUL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBC5.DECBUL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.11

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.05

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

2.99

-1.25

IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBC5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is comparable to the CBUL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBC5.DE and CBUL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBC5.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, which is greater than CBUL.DE's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC5.DE and CBUL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBC5.DECBUL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-5.07%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.19%

-1.58%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.06%

-1.58%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.85%

-1.02%

-8.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-1.81%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.56%

+0.41%

Volatility

IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBC5.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (CBUL.DE) at 0.74%. This indicates that IBC5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBC5.DECBUL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

0.74%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

2.92%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

3.98%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

3.46%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.31%

3.46%

+2.85%

IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBC5.DE and CBUL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBC5.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBC5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBUL.DE
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
5.91%5.98%6.93%5.21%0.33%
IBC5.DE
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBC5.DE and CBUL.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBC5.DE and CBUL.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

IBC5.DE tracks Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while CBUL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond 0-5 Years Index (EUR Hedged).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBC5.DE and CBUL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer