PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (E15H.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XEIN.DE having a 2.96% return and E15H.DE slightly lower at 2.91%.


XEIN.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.08%
6M
3.38%
YTD
2.96%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
1.98%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
1.42%

E15H.DE

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.14%
6M
3.29%
YTD
2.91%
1Y
2.34%
3Y*
2.00%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XEIN.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.96%0.88%-0.23%5.58%-9.52%6.29%2.51%
E15H.DE
Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.91%0.86%-0.10%5.42%-9.40%6.32%2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XEIN.DE and E15H.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.93

The correlation between XEIN.DE and E15H.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEIN.DE
XEIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XEIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

E15H.DE
E15H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
E15H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
E15H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
E15H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
E15H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
E15H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (E15H.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEIN.DEE15H.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.17

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

3.55

-0.14

XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the E15H.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEIN.DE and E15H.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.30%, roughly equal to the maximum E15H.DE drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEIN.DE and E15H.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEIN.DEE15H.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.30%

-15.98%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-2.00%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.33%

-5.43%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-15.98%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

-5.61%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-7.16%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.65%

+0.04%

Volatility

XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (E15H.DE) at 0.81%. This indicates that XEIN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than E15H.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEIN.DEE15H.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

0.81%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

3.09%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

3.86%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

6.66%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

6.34%

-0.19%

XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEIN.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than E15H.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEIN.DE vs. E15H.DE - Dividend Comparison

XEIN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while E15H.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
E15H.DE
Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.94%0.97%0.82%0.74%0.94%0.86%0.36%
XEIN.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEIN.DE and E15H.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, E15H.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

E15H.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XEIN.DE.

XEIN.DE tracks iBoxx Euro Inflation-Linked Index, while E15H.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XEIN.DE and 0.09% for E15H.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEIN.DE and E15H.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer