PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) and iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEI.TO achieves a 23.25% return, which is significantly higher than CYH.TO's 10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, XEI.TO has outperformed CYH.TO with an annualized return of 12.30%, while CYH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.


XEI.TO

1D
0.85%
1M
3.41%
YTD
23.25%
6M
23.82%
1Y
45.53%
3Y*
22.82%
5Y*
15.75%
10Y*
12.30%

CYH.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
10.22%
6M
11.20%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
23.25%25.96%15.42%6.69%0.41%35.88%-7.53%25.44%-10.85%7.24%
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
10.22%18.77%12.29%3.84%-2.47%23.43%-8.71%14.38%-6.21%13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XEI.TO and CYH.TO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.62

The correlation between XEI.TO and CYH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEI.TO
CYH.TO

Energy

32.1%
14.2%

Financial Services

31.4%
23.4%

Utilities

11.2%
15.9%

Communication Services

7.6%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
8.4%

Real Estate

4.8%
1.1%

Basic Materials

4.6%
3.6%

Technology

0.7%
3.4%

Industrials

0.7%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
11.9%

Healthcare

0.2%
5.1%

Energy

XEI.TO
32.1%
CYH.TO
14.2%

Financial Services

XEI.TO
31.4%
CYH.TO
23.4%

Utilities

XEI.TO
11.2%
CYH.TO
15.9%

Communication Services

XEI.TO
7.6%
CYH.TO
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XEI.TO
6.2%
CYH.TO
8.4%

Real Estate

XEI.TO
4.8%
CYH.TO
1.1%

Basic Materials

XEI.TO
4.6%
CYH.TO
3.6%

Technology

XEI.TO
0.7%
CYH.TO
3.4%

Industrials

XEI.TO
0.7%
CYH.TO
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

XEI.TO
0.5%
CYH.TO
11.9%

Healthcare

XEI.TO
0.2%
CYH.TO
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEI.TO
XEI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CYH.TO
CYH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) and iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEI.TOCYH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.34

1.43

+0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.39

4.45

+15.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

69.23

17.05

+52.18

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 6.34, which is higher than the CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEI.TO and CYH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEI.TOCYH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.34

2.39

+3.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.41

0.63

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.49

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.33

+0.34

Drawdowns

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEI.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum CYH.TO drawdown of -61.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEI.TO and CYH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEI.TOCYH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-61.48%

+15.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-5.34%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.92%

-12.13%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.32%

-17.67%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.51%

-42.30%

-3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.30%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-9.94%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

1.39%

-0.73%

Volatility

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) at 2.62%. This indicates that XEI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CYH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEI.TOCYH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.62%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.03%

7.13%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.24%

9.96%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.24%

13.58%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

17.02%

-1.01%

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEI.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CYH.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEI.TO vs. CYH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than CYH.TO's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
3.33%3.77%4.33%4.68%4.72%3.89%4.51%4.01%3.98%3.03%3.39%3.84%
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
3.53%4.39%5.56%5.08%4.78%3.65%5.13%4.71%5.53%4.37%4.51%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEI.TO and CYH.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEI.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEI.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for CYH.TO.

XEI.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CYH.TO is Global Equities. XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index, while CYH.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XEI.TO and 0.66% for CYH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEI.TO and CYH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer