XEG.TO vs. FXN
XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) and FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) are both Energy Equities funds - XEG.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index while FXN tracks the StrataQuant Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEG.TO returned 11.85%/yr vs 7.29%/yr for FXN. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEG.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXN.
Performance
XEG.TO vs. FXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XEG.TO is traded in CAD, while FXN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FXN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEG.TO achieves a 44.34% return, which is significantly higher than FXN's 37.76% return. Over the past 10 years, XEG.TO has outperformed FXN with an annualized return of 11.85%, while FXN has yielded a comparatively lower 7.29% annualized return.
XEG.TO
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 44.34%
- 6M
- 39.73%
- 1Y
- 70.40%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 29.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
FXN
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 37.76%
- 6M
- 30.39%
- 1Y
- 53.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
XEG.TO vs. FXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 44.34% | 16.72% | 14.08% | 3.52% | 53.25% | 83.71% | -34.41% | 8.98% | -27.05% | -11.18% |
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 37.76% | -1.35% | 8.88% | -1.25% | 57.39% | 50.41% | -21.26% | -11.34% | -18.41% | -11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEG.TO and FXN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XEG.TO and FXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
XEG.TO vs. FXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XEG.TO
FXN
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XEG.TO
FXN
Basic Materials
XEG.TO
-
FXN
-
Communication Services
XEG.TO
-
FXN
-
Consumer Cyclical
XEG.TO
-
FXN
-
Consumer Defensive
XEG.TO
-
FXN
-
Financial Services
XEG.TO
-
FXN
-
Healthcare
XEG.TO
-
FXN
-
Industrials
XEG.TO
-
FXN
-
Real Estate
XEG.TO
-
FXN
-
Technology
XEG.TO
-
FXN
Utilities
XEG.TO
-
FXN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEG.TO vs. FXN — Risk / Return Rank
XEG.TO
FXN
XEG.TO vs. FXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) and First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEG.TO | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.36 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.36 | 4.14 | +2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.02 | 12.25 | +6.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEG.TO | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11 | 2.29 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.77 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.22 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.23 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
XEG.TO vs. FXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEG.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.74%, which is greater than FXN's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEG.TO and FXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEG.TO | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.74% | -82.97% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -13.10% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.67% | -29.32% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.42% | -29.32% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.66% | -78.17% | -1.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -3.67% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.19% | -24.38% | -4.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 4.42% | -0.71% |
Volatility
XEG.TO vs. FXN - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.31% compared to First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) at 7.70%. This indicates that XEG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEG.TO | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.31% | 7.70% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.99% | 17.56% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.76% | 23.77% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.62% | 26.85% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.41% | 32.62% | +0.79% |
XEG.TO vs. FXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEG.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FXN's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEG.TO vs. FXN - Dividend Comparison
XEG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than FXN's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 1.76% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 3.09% | 2.28% | 0.87% | 4.71% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.05% | 2.36% |
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 2.65% | 3.63% | 3.46% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 1.64% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.25% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 3.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEG.TO and FXN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEG.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEG.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXN.
XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index, while FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XEG.TO and 0.64% for FXN.
Find the right allocation for XEG.TO and FXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer