XECT.DE vs. AMED.DE
XECT.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - XECT.DE tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XECT.DE returned 11.71%/yr vs 15.64%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XECT.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
XECT.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XECT.DE achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.28% return.
XECT.DE
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- 1Y
- 14.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMED.DE
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 26.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
XECT.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XECT.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C | 6.46% | 16.87% | 7.18% | 7.63% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.28% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XECT.DE and AMED.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XECT.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XECT.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XECT.DE
AMED.DE
XECT.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C (XECT.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XECT.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.33 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.50 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 9.42 | -4.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XECT.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.74 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.47 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
XECT.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XECT.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XECT.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XECT.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.63% | -38.35% | +21.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -10.56% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.63% | -14.07% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -0.68% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -6.69% | +4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.81% | +0.25% |
Volatility
XECT.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C (XECT.DE) is 5.02%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that XECT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XECT.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 5.90% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 12.64% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 15.18% | -1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 15.87% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 17.00% | -3.94% |
XECT.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XECT.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XECT.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XECT.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XECT.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XECT.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XECT.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
XECT.DE tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XECT.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for XECT.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer