PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWT.L achieves a 24.10% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.L's 30.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWT.L has outperformed XDW0.L with an annualized return of 24.28%, while XDW0.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.43% annualized return.


XDWT.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
13.92%
YTD
24.10%
6M
23.59%
1Y
51.40%
3Y*
32.85%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
24.28%

XDW0.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
30.91%
6M
28.80%
1Y
47.41%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
9.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
24.10%22.42%33.90%54.82%-31.38%29.86%44.46%46.27%-3.14%37.72%
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
30.91%14.66%2.10%3.69%46.28%39.22%-30.39%10.05%-15.68%5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWT.L and XDW0.L is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2016

0.30

The correlation between XDWT.L and XDW0.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWT.L
XDW0.L

Technology

99.1%

-

Communication Services

0.6%
0.1%

Industrials

0.3%

-

Energy

0.1%
99.9%

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XDWT.L
99.1%
XDW0.L

-

Communication Services

XDWT.L
0.6%
XDW0.L
0.1%

Industrials

XDWT.L
0.3%
XDW0.L

-

Energy

XDWT.L
0.1%
XDW0.L
99.9%

Healthcare

XDWT.L
0.1%
XDW0.L

-

Financial Services

XDWT.L
0.1%
XDW0.L

-

Basic Materials

XDWT.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDWT.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XDWT.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Real Estate

XDWT.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Utilities

XDWT.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWT.LXDW0.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.89

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

12.98

-3.96

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWT.L and XDW0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWT.LXDW0.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.46

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.79

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.36

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.39

+0.72

Drawdowns

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.L drawdown of -63.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.L and XDW0.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWT.LXDW0.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-63.72%

+27.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-12.14%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.10%

-18.90%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.99%

-26.47%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

-63.72%

+27.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-6.03%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-12.31%

+5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

3.64%

+2.04%

Volatility

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) have volatilities of 7.39% and 7.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWT.LXDW0.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

7.38%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.71%

16.33%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

19.23%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

24.24%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

26.16%

-4.07%

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWT.L and XDW0.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWT.L vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWT.L nor XDW0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWT.L and XDW0.L have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWT.L and XDW0.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDWT.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDW0.L is Energy Equities. XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWT.L and XDW0.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer