PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
32.08%14.66%2.10%3.69%46.28%11.70%
CWEU.L
Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD
26.18%26.39%-20.71%2.18%45.18%9.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 32.08% return, which is significantly higher than CWEU.L's 26.18% return.


XDW0.L

1D
-4.79%
1M
5.89%
YTD
32.08%
6M
35.11%
1Y
36.36%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*

CWEU.L

1D
-1.91%
1M
8.18%
YTD
26.18%
6M
30.79%
1Y
58.06%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDW0.L and CWEU.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CWEU.L
CWEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CWEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CWEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDW0.LCWEU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

3.50

-1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

4.55

-2.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.65

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

4.94

-2.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.27

26.17

-15.90

XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the CWEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.L and CWEU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDW0.LCWEU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

3.50

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.24

-0.83

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.L and CWEU.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDW0.L nor CWEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than CWEU.L's maximum drawdown of -29.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and CWEU.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDW0.LCWEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-29.78%

-33.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.44%

-6.84%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.20%

-1.91%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-9.01%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.10%

+1.40%

Volatility

XDW0.L vs. CWEU.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L) at 6.56%. This indicates that XDW0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDW0.LCWEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

6.56%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

11.62%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.62%

17.99%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.18%

36.72%

-12.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.06%

36.72%

-10.66%