XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L
XDWT.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWT.L returned 24.28%/yr vs 6.66%/yr for XCX5.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDWT.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDWT.L is traded in USD, while XCX5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XCX5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWT.L achieves a 24.10% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWT.L has outperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 24.28%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.66% annualized return.
XDWT.L
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 13.92%
- YTD
- 24.10%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 51.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.85%
- 5Y*
- 21.37%
- 10Y*
- 24.28%
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -12.92%
- 6M
- -12.12%
- 1Y
- -12.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.66%
XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWT.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 24.10% | 22.42% | 33.90% | 54.82% | -31.38% | 29.86% | 44.46% | 46.27% | -3.14% | 37.72% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -12.92% | 2.00% | 10.06% | 18.50% | -8.61% | 25.05% | 12.84% | 6.69% | -9.02% | 36.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWT.L and XCX5.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2016 | 0.41 |
The correlation between XDWT.L and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWT.L
XCX5.L
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XDWT.L
XCX5.L
Communication Services
XDWT.L
XCX5.L
Industrials
XDWT.L
XCX5.L
Energy
XDWT.L
XCX5.L
Healthcare
XDWT.L
XCX5.L
Financial Services
XDWT.L
XCX5.L
Basic Materials
XDWT.L
-
XCX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDWT.L
-
XCX5.L
Consumer Defensive
XDWT.L
-
XCX5.L
Real Estate
XDWT.L
-
XCX5.L
Utilities
XDWT.L
-
XCX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWT.L
XCX5.L
XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWT.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.88 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | -0.60 | +3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | -1.43 | +10.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWT.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | -0.78 | +3.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.18 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 0.32 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.16 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, smaller than the maximum XCX5.L drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.L and XCX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWT.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.99% | -45.61% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | -21.35% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.10% | -27.32% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.99% | -27.32% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.99% | -45.61% | +9.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -22.59% | +19.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -12.45% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 9.01% | -3.33% |
Volatility
XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) at 6.57%. This indicates that XDWT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWT.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 6.57% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.71% | 14.12% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 16.59% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 17.21% | +6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 20.66% | +1.43% |
XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDWT.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWT.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWT.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWT.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWT.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
XDWT.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWT.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWT.L and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer