PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWT.L is traded in USD, while WELU.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WELU.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWT.L achieves a 24.10% return, which is significantly higher than WELU.DE's 20.14% return.


XDWT.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
13.92%
YTD
24.10%
6M
23.59%
1Y
51.40%
3Y*
32.85%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
24.28%

WELU.DE

1D
-1.61%
1M
12.14%
YTD
20.14%
6M
19.68%
1Y
46.65%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
24.10%22.42%33.90%54.82%5.74%
WELU.DE
Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
20.14%23.66%30.71%62.40%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWT.L and WELU.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.90

The correlation between XDWT.L and WELU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

WELU.DE
WELU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WELU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WELU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWT.LWELU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.73

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

8.05

+0.97

XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the WELU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWT.L and WELU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWT.LWELU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.28

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.79

-0.67

Drawdowns

XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, which is greater than WELU.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.L and WELU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWT.LWELU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-25.21%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-17.01%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.10%

-25.21%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-2.80%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-4.11%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

5.78%

-0.10%

Volatility

XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELU.DE) at 6.74%. This indicates that XDWT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWT.LWELU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

6.74%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.71%

15.15%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

20.35%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

22.67%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

22.67%

-0.58%

XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WELU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWT.L vs. WELU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWT.L nor WELU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XDWT.L and WELU.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WELU.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WELU.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.L.

XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while WELU.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWT.L and 0.18% for WELU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWT.L and WELU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer