WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WELU.DE (Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and XUTC.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both Technology Equities funds - WELU.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology while XUTC.DE tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELU.DE returned 27.35%/yr vs 30.49%/yr for XUTC.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WELU.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUTC.DE.

Performance

WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELU.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELU.DE achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly lower than XUTC.DE's 24.28% return.

WELU.DE

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: 12.92%
• YTD: 21.54%
• 6M: 20.01%
• 1Y: 44.17%
• 3Y*: 27.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XUTC.DE

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: 14.39%
• YTD: 24.28%
• 6M: 23.11%
• 1Y: 49.23%
• 3Y*: 30.49%
• 5Y*: 24.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WELU.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc	21.54%	9.54%	38.64%	57.43%	0.20%
XUTC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D	24.28%	9.83%	44.60%	52.37%	-5.42%

Correlation

The correlation between WELU.DE and XUTC.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022	0.98

The correlation between WELU.DE and XUTC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELU.DE

WELU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
WELU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
WELU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
WELU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
WELU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
WELU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44

XUTC.DE

XUTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 63
XUTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XUTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XUTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
XUTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XUTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELU.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WELU.DE	XUTC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.37	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	3.05	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.38	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	3.03	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.94	7.84	-0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the XUTC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELU.DE and XUTC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WELU.DE	XUTC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	2.37	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	1.10	+0.41

Drawdowns

WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum XUTC.DE drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELU.DE and XUTC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WELU.DE	XUTC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.67%	-31.79%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.26%	-16.16%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	-30.48%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-3.00%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-6.37%	+1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.35%	6.26%	+0.09%

Volatility

WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELU.DE) is 6.70%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that WELU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUTC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WELU.DE	XUTC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.70%	7.31%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.75%	15.12%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.41%	20.70%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.28%	23.01%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.28%	22.97%	-0.69%

WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WELU.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XUTC.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

WELU.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Dividend Comparison

WELU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUTC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WELU.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUTC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D	0.26%	0.34%	0.36%	0.53%	1.14%	0.51%	0.64%	0.59%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WELU.DE and XUTC.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, WELU.DE and XUTC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WELU.DE or XUTC.DE?

On fees, XUTC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WELU.DE or XUTC.DE?

XUTC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELU.DE.

What is the main difference between WELU.DE and XUTC.DE?

WELU.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology, while XUTC.DE tracks MSCI USA Information Technology 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELU.DE and 0.12% for XUTC.DE.