PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWS.L vs. KXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWS.L vs. KXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWS.L achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than KXI's 3.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDWS.L having a 5.57% annualized return and KXI not far behind at 5.49%.


XDWS.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
3.29%
6M
3.85%
1Y
0.79%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
5.57%

KXI

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
3.05%
6M
3.22%
1Y
1.47%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
5.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWS.L vs. KXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
3.29%9.31%5.69%1.96%-5.24%12.84%7.75%22.32%-10.10%17.07%
KXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
3.05%9.68%4.20%2.41%-6.02%13.71%7.69%23.40%-10.71%17.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWS.L and KXI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2016

0.66

The correlation between XDWS.L and KXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDWS.L vs. KXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWS.L
KXI

Consumer Defensive

97.3%
96.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
3.1%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

XDWS.L
97.3%
KXI
96.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDWS.L
2.2%
KXI
3.1%

Financial Services

XDWS.L
0.2%
KXI

-

Healthcare

XDWS.L
0.2%
KXI

-

Basic Materials

XDWS.L

-

KXI

-

Communication Services

XDWS.L

-

KXI

-

Energy

XDWS.L

-

KXI

-

Industrials

XDWS.L

-

KXI

-

Real Estate

XDWS.L

-

KXI

-

Technology

XDWS.L

-

KXI

-

Utilities

XDWS.L

-

KXI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWS.L vs. KXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWS.L
XDWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XDWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

KXI
KXI Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWS.L vs. KXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWS.LKXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.03

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

0.14

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.18

0.32

-0.14

XDWS.L vs. KXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the KXI Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWS.L and KXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWS.LKXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

0.13

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.30

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.40

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.49

-0.01

Drawdowns

XDWS.L vs. KXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum KXI drawdown of -42.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.L and KXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWS.LKXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.72%

-42.27%

+18.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-10.24%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.52%

-11.92%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.53%

-17.45%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.72%

-24.59%

+0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.95%

-9.43%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-5.37%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

4.65%

-0.27%

Volatility

XDWS.L vs. KXI - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) at 3.81%. This indicates that XDWS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWS.LKXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

3.81%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

9.33%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

11.78%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

12.45%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.48%

13.74%

-1.26%

XDWS.L vs. KXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KXI's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWS.L vs. KXI - Dividend Comparison

XDWS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
2.23%2.29%2.51%2.99%1.98%2.26%2.34%2.17%2.97%2.17%2.34%2.20%
XDWS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWS.L and KXI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for KXI.

XDWS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while KXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWS.L and 0.46% for KXI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWS.L and KXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer