XDWS.L vs. BTAL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDWS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C) and BTAL (AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWS.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while BTAL is a Long-Short fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWS.L returned 5.57%/yr vs -4.62%/yr for BTAL. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. XDWS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 2.11%/yr for BTAL.

Performance

XDWS.L vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWS.L achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -20.01% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWS.L has outperformed BTAL with an annualized return of 5.57%, while BTAL has yielded a comparatively lower -4.62% annualized return.

XDWS.L

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -2.75%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 3.85%
• 1Y: 0.79%
• 3Y*: 6.17%
• 5Y*: 3.97%
• 10Y*: 5.57%

BTAL

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -5.73%
• YTD: -20.01%
• 6M: -18.90%
• 1Y: -36.97%
• 3Y*: -12.72%
• 5Y*: -4.64%
• 10Y*: -4.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWS.L vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDWS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C	3.29%	9.31%	5.69%	1.96%	-5.24%	12.84%	7.75%	22.32%	-10.10%	17.07%
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	-20.01%	-20.17%	12.83%	-15.11%	20.48%	-6.81%	-13.86%	1.07%	15.13%	-2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWS.L and BTAL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2016	-0.03

The correlation between XDWS.L and BTAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (10 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWS.L vs. BTAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDWS.L	BTAL
Consumer Defensive	97.3%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	2.2%	12.8%
Financial Services	0.2%	14.9%
Healthcare	0.2%	10.2%
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Communication Services	-	3.4%
Energy	-	4.4%
Industrials	-	13.7%
Real Estate	-	6.2%
Technology	-	19.5%
Utilities	-	5.2%

Return for Risk

XDWS.L vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWS.L

XDWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 10
XDWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
XDWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
XDWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9
XDWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
XDWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BTAL

BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 0
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWS.L vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDWS.L	BTAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	-1.72	+1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	-2.69	+2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	0.72	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	-0.99	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.18	-1.71	+1.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDWS.L vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWS.L and BTAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDWS.L	BTAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06	-1.72	+1.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	-0.25	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	-0.27	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	-0.24	+0.72

Drawdowns

XDWS.L vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum BTAL drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.L and BTAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDWS.L	BTAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.72%	-50.28%	+26.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.74%	-37.50%	+27.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.52%	-45.16%	+33.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.53%	-45.16%	+27.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.72%	-50.28%	+26.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.95%	-50.15%	+41.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-21.96%	+17.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	21.67%	-17.29%

Volatility

XDWS.L vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) is 4.62%, while AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that XDWS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDWS.L	BTAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	7.47%	-2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	15.38%	-5.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	21.58%	-9.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.11%	18.75%	-6.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.48%	17.23%	-4.75%

XDWS.L vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 2.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDWS.L vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

XDWS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	3.11%	2.49%	3.49%	6.14%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.88%	0.39%
XDWS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDWS.L and BTAL in my portfolio?

XDWS.L and BTAL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDWS.L or BTAL?

On fees, XDWS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDWS.L or BTAL?

XDWS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.

What is the main difference between XDWS.L and BTAL?

XDWS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while BTAL is Long-Short. XDWS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while BTAL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and AGF. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWS.L and 2.11% for BTAL.