XDWM.DE vs. SC0W.DE
XDWM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C) and SC0W.DE (Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - XDWM.DE tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while SC0W.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Basic Resources. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWM.DE returned 10.70%/yr vs 17.03%/yr for SC0W.DE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWM.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SC0W.DE.
Performance
XDWM.DE vs. SC0W.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWM.DE achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly lower than SC0W.DE's 32.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWM.DE has underperformed SC0W.DE with an annualized return of 10.70%, while SC0W.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.03% annualized return.
XDWM.DE
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 6M
- 20.60%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
SC0W.DE
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 11.15%
- YTD
- 32.91%
- 6M
- 42.46%
- 1Y
- 84.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- 17.03%
XDWM.DE vs. SC0W.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C | 15.62% | 12.88% | 0.02% | 10.77% | -4.99% | 26.01% | 9.43% | 25.66% | -13.34% | 13.08% |
SC0W.DE Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF | 32.91% | 33.79% | -7.95% | -3.82% | 9.72% | 27.53% | 12.84% | 22.79% | -10.57% | 24.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWM.DE and SC0W.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XDWM.DE and SC0W.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWM.DE vs. SC0W.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWM.DE
SC0W.DE
XDWM.DE vs. SC0W.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) and Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF (SC0W.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWM.DE | SC0W.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 4.75 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 18.77 | -9.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWM.DE | SC0W.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 3.13 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.60 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.28 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
XDWM.DE vs. SC0W.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWM.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum SC0W.DE drawdown of -68.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWM.DE and SC0W.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWM.DE | SC0W.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -68.06% | +34.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -17.64% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -34.35% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -38.09% | +17.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.91% | -45.64% | +11.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -2.54% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -21.96% | +16.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 4.38% | -1.04% |
Volatility
XDWM.DE vs. SC0W.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) is 6.55%, while Invesco European Basic Resources Sector UCITS ETF (SC0W.DE) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that XDWM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0W.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWM.DE | SC0W.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 10.17% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 22.56% | -7.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 26.72% | -9.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 27.37% | -10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 28.35% | -10.77% |
XDWM.DE vs. SC0W.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0W.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWM.DE vs. SC0W.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWM.DE nor SC0W.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWM.DE and SC0W.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SC0W.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SC0W.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWM.DE.
XDWM.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SC0W.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Basic Resources. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWM.DE and 0.20% for SC0W.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWM.DE and SC0W.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer