XDWI.DE vs. XDWD.DE
XDWI.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWI.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDWD.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.DE returned 12.07%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for XDWD.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWI.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XDWD.DE.
Performance
XDWI.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWI.DE achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly higher than XDWD.DE's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.DE has underperformed XDWD.DE with an annualized return of 12.07%, while XDWD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.
XDWI.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
XDWD.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
XDWI.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWI.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C | 12.20% | 12.06% | 19.50% | 19.04% | -7.86% | 26.23% | 1.52% | 31.50% | -11.18% | 10.04% |
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C | 10.91% | 7.85% | 25.98% | 20.18% | -13.67% | 32.74% | 5.48% | 31.27% | -4.94% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWI.DE and XDWD.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XDWI.DE and XDWD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWI.DE vs. XDWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWI.DE
XDWD.DE
XDWI.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWI.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.40 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 3.63 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 14.44 | -6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWI.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.14 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.90 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.84 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.78 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
XDWI.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWI.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, which is greater than XDWD.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.DE and XDWD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWI.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.10% | -33.55% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -6.54% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.09% | -21.64% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.09% | -21.64% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.10% | -33.55% | -4.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.33% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -4.55% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 1.65% | +0.95% |
Volatility
XDWI.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) at 2.60%. This indicates that XDWI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWI.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 2.60% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 7.77% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 11.12% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 14.13% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 15.16% | +1.62% |
XDWI.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWI.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWD.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWI.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWI.DE nor XDWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWI.DE and XDWD.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWD.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWD.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWI.DE.
XDWI.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XDWD.DE is Global Equities. XDWI.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWI.DE and 0.19% for XDWD.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWI.DE and XDWD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer