XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L
XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XDW0.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.L returned 7.85%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for XDW0.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.L achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.L's 30.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.L has underperformed XDW0.L with an annualized return of 7.85%, while XDW0.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.43% annualized return.
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
XDW0.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 30.91%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- 1Y
- 47.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.74% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 20.56% | 12.88% | 22.95% | 1.57% | 20.16% |
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 30.91% | 14.66% | 2.10% | 3.69% | 46.28% | 39.22% | -30.39% | 10.05% | -15.68% | 5.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.L and XDW0.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.32 |
The correlation between XDWH.L and XDW0.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWH.L
XDW0.L
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XDWH.L
XDW0.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDWH.L
XDW0.L
-
Basic Materials
XDWH.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Communication Services
XDWH.L
-
XDW0.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDWH.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Energy
XDWH.L
-
XDW0.L
Financial Services
XDWH.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Industrials
XDWH.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Real Estate
XDWH.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Technology
XDWH.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Utilities
XDWH.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.L
XDW0.L
XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWH.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.42 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.89 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 12.98 | -10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWH.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 2.46 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.79 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.36 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.39 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.L drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.L drawdown of -63.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.L and XDW0.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.24% | -63.72% | +37.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.39% | -12.14% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -18.90% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.28% | -26.47% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.24% | -63.72% | +37.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -6.03% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -12.31% | +7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 3.64% | +0.48% |
Volatility
XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) is 4.80%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that XDWH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 7.38% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 16.33% | -5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 19.23% | -4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 24.24% | -10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 26.16% | -11.19% |
XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWH.L and XDW0.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWH.L vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.L nor XDW0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.L and XDW0.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.L and XDW0.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDWH.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XDW0.L is Energy Equities. XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.L and XDW0.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer