XDWH.DE vs. XGEN.DE
XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and XGEN.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Xtrackers - XDWH.DE tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD while XGEN.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Genomic Innovation Select ESG Screened 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDWH.DE returned 2.67%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for XGEN.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWH.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XGEN.DE.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. XGEN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.DE achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than XGEN.DE's -1.40% return.
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XGEN.DE
- 1D
- 3.92%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -3.78%
- 1Y
- 22.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE vs. XGEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.33% |
XGEN.DE Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | -1.40% | 7.38% | 2.95% | -5.84% | -9.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XGEN.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XGEN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.DE vs. XGEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.DE
XGEN.DE
XDWH.DE vs. XGEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWH.DE | XGEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.21 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.49 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 3.61 | -1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWH.DE | XGEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.23 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | -0.11 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. XGEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, smaller than the maximum XGEN.DE drawdown of -37.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and XGEN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.DE | XGEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -37.58% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -14.99% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -28.21% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -14.86% | +6.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -19.44% | +14.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 6.19% | -1.99% |
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. XGEN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) is 4.81%, while Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGEN.DE) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that XDWH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGEN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.DE | XGEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 6.48% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 13.73% | -4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 18.19% | -4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 18.66% | -5.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 18.66% | -3.97% |
XDWH.DE vs. XGEN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XGEN.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. XGEN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor XGEN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.DE and XGEN.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XGEN.DE.
XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XGEN.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Genomic Innovation Select ESG Screened 100. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.DE and 0.30% for XGEN.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and XGEN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer