PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XEOD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWH.DE achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly higher than XEOD.DE's 0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE has outperformed XEOD.DE with an annualized return of 8.50%, while XEOD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.71% annualized return.


XDWH.DE

1D
1.61%
1M
6.35%
YTD
3.33%
6M
3.64%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
8.50%

XEOD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.94%
6M
0.99%
1Y
1.95%
3Y*
2.96%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
0.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
3.33%2.20%7.45%0.04%0.11%30.30%2.70%27.21%5.98%5.52%
XEOD.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D
0.94%2.22%3.75%3.32%-0.03%-0.58%-0.58%-0.49%-0.49%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWH.DE and XEOD.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWH.DE
XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XEOD.DE
XEOD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XEOD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEOD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEOD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XEOD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEOD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XEOD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDWH.DEXEOD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-10.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

2.67

-1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

38.45

-36.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.73

164.20

-159.47

XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the XEOD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 6.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWH.DE and XEOD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, which is greater than XEOD.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and XEOD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWH.DEXEOD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.65%

-8.62%

-32.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-0.05%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.11%

-0.19%

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.11%

-0.67%

-20.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.06%

-3.24%

-22.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

0.00%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-2.24%

-5.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

0.01%

+3.83%

Volatility

XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XEOD.DE) at 0.07%. This indicates that XDWH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEOD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWH.DEXEOD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

0.07%

+5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

0.26%

+9.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.03%

0.32%

+13.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

0.30%

+13.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

0.25%

+15.37%

XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWH.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XEOD.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWH.DE vs. XEOD.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDWH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEOD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEOD.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D
1.86%2.33%3.69%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.83%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWH.DE and XEOD.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEOD.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEOD.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.

XDWH.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XEOD.DE is Money Market. XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XEOD.DE tracks €STR + 8.5 bps. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.DE and 0.10% for XEOD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and XEOD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer