PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XEOD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEOD.DE achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than XDWD.DE's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XEOD.DE has underperformed XDWD.DE with an annualized return of 0.70%, while XDWD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.


XEOD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.83%
6M
0.97%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
0.70%

XDWD.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.72%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.37%
1Y
23.85%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEOD.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D
0.83%2.22%3.75%3.32%-0.03%-0.58%-0.58%-0.49%-0.49%-0.54%
XDWD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
10.91%7.85%25.98%20.18%-13.67%32.74%5.48%31.27%-4.94%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XEOD.DE and XDWD.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2014

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEOD.DE
XEOD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XEOD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEOD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEOD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XEOD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEOD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWD.DE
XDWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XEOD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEOD.DEXDWD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.56

1.40

+1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

38.23

3.63

+34.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

158.09

14.44

+143.65

XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEOD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 5.95, which is higher than the XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEOD.DE and XDWD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEOD.DEXDWD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.95

2.14

+3.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

6.40

0.90

+5.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.76

0.84

+1.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.78

-0.50

Drawdowns

XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEOD.DE drawdown since its inception was -7.47%, smaller than the maximum XDWD.DE drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEOD.DE and XDWD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEOD.DEXDWD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-33.55%

+26.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.05%

-6.54%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.19%

-21.64%

+21.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.71%

-21.64%

+20.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.27%

-33.55%

+30.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-4.55%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

1.65%

-1.64%

Volatility

XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XEOD.DE) is 0.08%, while Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that XEOD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEOD.DEXDWD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

2.60%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.26%

7.77%

-7.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33%

11.12%

-10.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.30%

14.13%

-13.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.25%

15.16%

-14.91%

XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEOD.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWD.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEOD.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Dividend Comparison

XEOD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, while XDWD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDWD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEOD.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D
1.86%2.33%3.69%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.83%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEOD.DE and XDWD.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEOD.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEOD.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XDWD.DE.

XEOD.DE is categorized as Money Market, while XDWD.DE is Global Equities. XEOD.DE tracks €STR + 8.5 bps, while XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XEOD.DE and 0.19% for XDWD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEOD.DE and XDWD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer