PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.DE vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.DE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEB.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.DE achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.DE has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 6.88%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.


XDEB.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
1.39%
YTD
1.77%
6M
1.85%
1Y
-0.13%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
6.88%

ACWI

1D
-0.61%
1M
6.03%
YTD
13.47%
6M
13.58%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
12.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.DE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.77%-1.27%17.83%3.66%-4.06%24.01%-6.66%26.17%1.99%3.04%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
13.47%7.89%25.20%18.61%-13.33%27.54%6.75%29.45%-4.92%9.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.DE and ACWI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between XDEB.DE and ACWI has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.DE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.DE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEB.DEACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.40

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

3.76

-3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.05

15.70

-15.75

XDEB.DE vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.DE and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEB.DEACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

2.17

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.82

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.75

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.55

+0.14

Drawdowns

XDEB.DE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.DE and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.DEACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-45.79%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-7.11%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-20.51%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-20.51%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

-32.80%

+4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.50%

-0.61%

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-6.43%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

1.70%

+0.67%

Volatility

XDEB.DE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) is 2.65%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that XDEB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.DEACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.20%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

9.30%

-3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.88%

12.32%

-4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.16%

15.12%

-4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.03%

16.97%

-4.94%

XDEB.DE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEB.DE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

XDEB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.DE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.DE and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.DE and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer