PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWE.L is traded in GBp, while SPX5.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SPX5.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWE.L achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than SPX5.L's 10.01% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWE.L has underperformed SPX5.L with an annualized return of 11.21%, while SPX5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.


XDWE.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.05%
6M
8.14%
YTD
11.09%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
11.21%

SPX5.L

1D
-0.52%
1M
-0.34%
6M
9.55%
YTD
10.01%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
14.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
11.09%3.94%14.06%7.78%-1.34%31.37%7.89%23.88%-3.60%7.83%
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.01%9.34%27.46%19.76%-9.00%30.96%13.52%26.33%-0.90%10.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWE.L and SPX5.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between XDWE.L and SPX5.L has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWE.L
SPX5.L

Technology

20.9%
39.1%

Industrials

14.2%
7.8%

Financial Services

13.9%
11.1%

Healthcare

11.1%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
4.5%

Real Estate

6.1%
1.8%

Utilities

5.7%
2.1%

Energy

4.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.3%

Communication Services

3.9%
10.8%

Technology

XDWE.L
20.9%
SPX5.L
39.1%

Industrials

XDWE.L
14.2%
SPX5.L
7.8%

Financial Services

XDWE.L
13.9%
SPX5.L
11.1%

Healthcare

XDWE.L
11.1%
SPX5.L
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XDWE.L
10.0%
SPX5.L
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

XDWE.L
6.4%
SPX5.L
4.5%

Real Estate

XDWE.L
6.1%
SPX5.L
1.8%

Utilities

XDWE.L
5.7%
SPX5.L
2.1%

Energy

XDWE.L
4.0%
SPX5.L
3.2%

Basic Materials

XDWE.L
3.9%
SPX5.L
1.3%

Communication Services

XDWE.L
3.9%
SPX5.L
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWE.L
XDWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPX5.L
SPX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDWE.LSPX5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.94

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

10.52

-0.73

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWE.L and SPX5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWE.L drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, which is greater than SPX5.L's maximum drawdown of -41.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWE.L and SPX5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWE.LSPX5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.55%

-41.23%

-57.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-7.07%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.89%

-20.90%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

-20.90%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.08%

-25.45%

-5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-1.06%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-7.45%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.98%

-0.21%

Volatility

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWE.LSPX5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.87%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

7.83%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

10.99%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.53%

14.30%

+5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

15.41%

+3.19%

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPX5.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWE.L vs. SPX5.L - Dividend Comparison

XDWE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.92%0.98%1.03%1.21%1.39%0.98%1.40%1.48%0.78%1.19%1.49%1.68%
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWE.L and SPX5.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDWE.L.

XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDWE.L and 0.03% for SPX5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWE.L and SPX5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer