SPX5.L vs. IUSA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L).
SPX5.L and IUSA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPX5.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2012. IUSA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 15, 2002. Both SPX5.L and IUSA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPX5.L or IUSA.L.
Performance
SPX5.L vs. IUSA.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPX5.L having a 24.95% return and IUSA.L slightly higher at 25.73%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPX5.L having a 15.14% annualized return and IUSA.L not far ahead at 15.71%.
SPX5.L
24.95%
4.07%
12.04%
29.99%
15.42%
15.14%
IUSA.L
25.73%
3.90%
12.68%
30.54%
16.03%
15.71%
Key characteristics
| SPX5.L | IUSA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.63 | 2.72 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.75 | 3.87 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.51 | 1.53 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.64 | 4.78 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.60 | 19.46 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.59% | 1.57% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.23% | 11.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.23% | -38.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.15% | -0.98% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPX5.L vs. IUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPX5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SPX5.L and IUSA.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPX5.L vs. IUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPX5.L vs. IUSA.L - Dividend Comparison
SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.01%, more than IUSA.L's 1.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPX5.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 79.01% | 120.99% | 138.50% | 97.80% | 140.46% | 147.87% | 170.82% | 157.18% | 149.13% | 168.09% | 142.74% | 156.08% |
IUSA.L iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist | 1.28% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 1.39% | 1.80% | 1.96% | 2.22% | 1.95% | 1.75% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
SPX5.L vs. IUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPX5.L drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, which is greater than IUSA.L's maximum drawdown of -38.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX5.L and IUSA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPX5.L vs. IUSA.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.