PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWE.L is traded in GBp, while SPMV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWE.L achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than SPMV.L's 4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWE.L has outperformed SPMV.L with an annualized return of 11.22%, while SPMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


XDWE.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.66%
6M
7.71%
YTD
11.78%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
11.22%

SPMV.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
-1.09%
6M
3.85%
YTD
4.39%
1Y
10.21%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
11.78%3.94%14.06%7.78%-1.34%31.37%7.89%23.88%-3.60%7.83%
SPMV.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.39%3.60%20.76%4.44%-0.48%26.16%4.26%26.25%0.26%6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWE.L and SPMV.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014

0.79

The correlation between XDWE.L and SPMV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWE.L
XDWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV.L
SPMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDWE.LSPMV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

1.97

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

5.80

+4.32

XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWE.L and SPMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWE.L drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, which is greater than SPMV.L's maximum drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWE.L and SPMV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWE.LSPMV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.55%

-25.15%

-73.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-5.16%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.89%

-14.55%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

-14.55%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.08%

-25.15%

-5.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.54%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-3.39%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.76%

+0.02%

Volatility

XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWE.LSPMV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.69%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.68%

7.28%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

9.59%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

12.68%

+6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

14.17%

+4.43%

XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWE.L and SPMV.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWE.L vs. SPMV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWE.L nor SPMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWE.L and SPMV.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWE.L and SPMV.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWE.L and SPMV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer