XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L
XDWE.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C) and SPLW.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - XDWE.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index while SPLW.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDWE.L returned 12.24%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for SPLW.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWE.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLW.L.
Performance
XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDWE.L is traded in GBp, while SPLW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPLW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWE.L achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPLW.L's 1.40% return.
XDWE.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
SPLW.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 1.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWE.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C | 9.58% | 3.94% | 14.06% | 7.78% | -1.34% | 11.23% |
SPLW.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc | 1.40% | -2.66% | 15.44% | -5.47% | 7.10% | 13.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWE.L and SPLW.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between XDWE.L and SPLW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Industrials
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Financial Services
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Healthcare
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Defensive
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Real Estate
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Utilities
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Energy
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Basic Materials
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Communication Services
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWE.L
SPLW.L
XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWE.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.03 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 0.18 | +3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | 0.45 | +11.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWE.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 0.12 | +2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.43 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.08%, which is greater than SPLW.L's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWE.L and SPLW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWE.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -14.28% | -16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.64% | -7.56% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -10.82% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.04% | +7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -5.84% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 3.03% | -1.26% |
Volatility
XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) is 2.03%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that XDWE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWE.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 3.98% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.45% | 8.70% | -2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.64% | 11.19% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 12.99% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 12.99% | +3.10% |
XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWE.L vs. SPLW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWE.L nor SPLW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWE.L and SPLW.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLW.L.
XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SPLW.L tracks S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDWE.L and 0.25% for SPLW.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWE.L and SPLW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer