PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLW.L vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPLW.L vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPLW.L vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPLW.L
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc
1.43%4.80%13.46%-0.49%-4.28%10.45%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.05%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-0.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLW.L achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.05% return.


SPLW.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
1.43%
6M
0.27%
1Y
-0.54%
3Y*
7.24%
5Y*
10Y*

BND

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
1.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPLW.L vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SPLW.L vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLW.L
SPLW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SPLW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLW.L vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPLW.LBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

0.99

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.03

1.41

-1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.18

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

1.81

-1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.27

4.98

-5.25

SPLW.L vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLW.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLW.L and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLW.LBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

0.99

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.59

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between SPLW.L and BND is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SPLW.L vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

SPLW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLW.L
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.91%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%

Drawdowns

SPLW.L vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.23%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLW.L and BND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLW.LBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-18.58%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-2.44%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-2.58%

-3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-3.07%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

0.89%

+2.07%

Volatility

SPLW.L vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.63%. This indicates that SPLW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPLW.LBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

1.63%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

2.52%

+4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

4.30%

+8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

6.00%

+6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.30%

5.52%

+6.78%