PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWC.L is traded in USD, while XXTW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XXTW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWC.L achieves a -2.34% return, which is significantly lower than XXTW.L's 24.17% return.


XDWC.L

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
-2.34%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
8.42%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
11.05%

XXTW.L

1D
-1.82%
1M
14.17%
YTD
24.17%
6M
23.85%
1Y
51.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XDWC.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C
-2.34%7.36%22.22%5.86%
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
24.17%22.41%33.94%14.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWC.L and XXTW.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.64

The correlation between XDWC.L and XXTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWC.L
XDWC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XDWC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWC.LXXTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.42

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

3.05

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

9.33

-7.76

XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWC.L and XXTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWC.LXXTW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.58

-2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.61

-1.04

Drawdowns

XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWC.L drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than XXTW.L's maximum drawdown of -26.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWC.L and XXTW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWC.LXXTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-26.61%

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.08%

-16.84%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-2.61%

-3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.31%

-4.09%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

5.51%

-0.17%

Volatility

XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) is 5.79%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that XDWC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWC.LXXTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

6.79%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

15.19%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

19.87%

-2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

22.00%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

22.00%

-2.32%

XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWC.L and XXTW.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWC.L vs. XXTW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWC.L nor XXTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWC.L and XXTW.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWC.L and XXTW.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDWC.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XXTW.L is Technology Equities. XDWC.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWC.L and XXTW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer