PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L has outperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 9.43%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.


XDW0.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
30.91%
6M
28.80%
1Y
47.41%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
9.43%

XDWH.L

1D
2.99%
1M
3.25%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-1.64%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
30.91%14.66%2.10%3.69%46.28%39.22%-30.39%10.05%-15.68%5.34%
XDWH.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-2.74%15.25%0.75%3.81%-5.42%20.56%12.88%22.95%1.57%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.L and XDWH.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016

0.32

The correlation between XDW0.L and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDW0.L
XDWH.L

Energy

99.9%

-

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

98.9%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XDW0.L
99.9%
XDWH.L

-

Communication Services

XDW0.L
0.1%
XDWH.L

-

Basic Materials

XDW0.L

-

XDWH.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDW0.L

-

XDWH.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XDW0.L

-

XDWH.L
0.5%

Financial Services

XDW0.L

-

XDWH.L

-

Healthcare

XDW0.L

-

XDWH.L
98.9%

Industrials

XDW0.L

-

XDWH.L

-

Real Estate

XDW0.L

-

XDWH.L

-

Technology

XDW0.L

-

XDWH.L

-

Utilities

XDW0.L

-

XDWH.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.L
XDWH.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDW0.LXDWH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.15

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

1.11

+2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

2.80

+10.18

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.L and XDWH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDW0.LXDWH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

0.79

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.32

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.52

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.57

-0.18

Drawdowns

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and XDWH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDW0.LXDWH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-26.24%

-37.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-10.39%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-19.28%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

-19.28%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.72%

-26.24%

-37.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-5.82%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-4.98%

-7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

4.12%

-0.48%

Volatility

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) at 4.80%. This indicates that XDW0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDW0.LXDWH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

4.80%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

10.77%

+5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.23%

14.57%

+4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

14.18%

+10.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.16%

14.97%

+11.19%

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDW0.L and XDWH.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDW0.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDW0.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDW0.L and XDWH.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDW0.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDW0.L and XDWH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer