XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L
XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDW0.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L returned 9.43%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for XDWH.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L has outperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 9.43%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.
XDW0.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 30.91%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- 1Y
- 47.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 30.91% | 14.66% | 2.10% | 3.69% | 46.28% | 39.22% | -30.39% | 10.05% | -15.68% | 5.34% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.74% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 20.56% | 12.88% | 22.95% | 1.57% | 20.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.L and XDWH.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.32 |
The correlation between XDW0.L and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDW0.L
XDWH.L
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XDW0.L
XDWH.L
-
Communication Services
XDW0.L
XDWH.L
-
Basic Materials
XDW0.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDW0.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDW0.L
-
XDWH.L
Financial Services
XDW0.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Healthcare
XDW0.L
-
XDWH.L
Industrials
XDW0.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Real Estate
XDW0.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Technology
XDW0.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Utilities
XDW0.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDW0.L
XDWH.L
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDW0.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.15 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 1.11 | +2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 2.80 | +10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDW0.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 0.79 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.32 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.52 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.57 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDW0.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.72% | -26.24% | -37.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -10.39% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -19.28% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -19.28% | -7.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.72% | -26.24% | -37.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -5.82% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -4.98% | -7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 4.12% | -0.48% |
Volatility
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) at 4.80%. This indicates that XDW0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDW0.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 4.80% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 10.77% | +5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 14.57% | +4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.24% | 14.18% | +10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 14.97% | +11.19% |
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDW0.L and XDWH.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDW0.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDW0.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDW0.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDW0.L and XDWH.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDW0.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XDW0.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer