XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDUK.L (Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - XDUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDUK.L returned 11.68%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRUK.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDUK.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.

Performance

XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XDUK.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDUK.L achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.

XDUK.L

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 6M: 8.72%
• 1Y: 20.63%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: 11.68%
• 10Y*: 9.01%

PRUK.L

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 2.88%
• 6M: 5.37%
• 1Y: 10.10%
• 3Y*: 8.92%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XDUK.L Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C	5.82%	25.82%	9.40%	7.51%	4.63%	17.70%	7.39%
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)	2.88%	13.57%	5.85%	7.37%	-22.76%	12.69%	22.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XDUK.L and PRUK.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020	0.65

The correlation between XDUK.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDUK.L

XDUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
XDUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
XDUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
XDUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XDUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XDUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

PRUK.L

PRUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
PRUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
PRUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PRUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
PRUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XDUK.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDUK.L	PRUK.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	0.70	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	1.09	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.13	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	0.76	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.78	2.52	+5.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDUK.L and PRUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDUK.L	PRUK.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	0.70	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.05	+0.87
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.38	+0.15

Drawdowns

XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDUK.L drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, smaller than the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUK.L and PRUK.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDUK.L	PRUK.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.28%	-36.10%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.20%	-13.05%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.84%	-18.00%	+5.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.84%	-36.10%	+23.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.10%	-3.76%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-14.80%	+10.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.93%	-1.27%

Volatility

XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XDUK.L) is 4.04%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that XDUK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDUK.L	PRUK.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	4.82%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.64%	11.72%	-2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.01%	14.14%	-3.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.78%	16.54%	-3.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.11%	17.45%	-2.34%

XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDUK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDUK.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison

XDUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)	3.60%	3.70%	3.63%	3.43%	3.50%	1.73%	0.29%
XDUK.L Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDUK.L and PRUK.L in my portfolio?

XDUK.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDUK.L or PRUK.L?

On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDUK.L or PRUK.L?

PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XDUK.L.

What is the main difference between XDUK.L and PRUK.L?

XDUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDUK.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.