XDUK.L vs. MMS.L
XDUK.L (Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - XDUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. XDUK.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
XDUK.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDUK.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
XDUK.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 20.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDUK.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XDUK.L Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 5.69% | 25.82% | 9.62% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDUK.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDUK.L
MMS.L
XDUK.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XDUK.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDUK.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDUK.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XDUK.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDUK.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | — | — |
Volatility
XDUK.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDUK.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | — | — |
XDUK.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDUK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDUK.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDUK.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XDUK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDUK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.
XDUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDUK.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for XDUK.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer