PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) and Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units (IDIV-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDU.TO achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than IDIV-B.TO's 10.75% return.


XDU.TO

1D
0.36%
1M
5.28%
YTD
11.82%
6M
6.05%
1Y
16.98%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*

IDIV-B.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.35%
YTD
10.75%
6M
8.02%
1Y
25.99%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF
11.82%2.42%14.09%3.53%1.66%
IDIV-B.TO
Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units
10.75%35.22%12.85%12.28%7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XDU.TO and IDIV-B.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.34

The correlation between XDU.TO and IDIV-B.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDU.TO
XDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IDIV-B.TO
IDIV-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IDIV-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDIV-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDIV-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IDIV-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDIV-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) and Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units (IDIV-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDU.TOIDIV-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.60

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

11.03

-2.80

XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the IDIV-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDU.TO and IDIV-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDU.TOIDIV-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

1.69

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.59

-1.02

Drawdowns

XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, which is greater than IDIV-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDU.TO and IDIV-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDU.TOIDIV-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

-13.62%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-10.03%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-13.62%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-3.00%

+2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-1.72%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.36%

-0.29%

Volatility

XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) is 2.73%, while Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units (IDIV-B.TO) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that XDU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDIV-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDU.TOIDIV-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

5.14%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

13.24%

-4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

15.48%

-4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.08%

14.06%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

14.06%

+0.85%

XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDU.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IDIV-B.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDU.TO vs. IDIV-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than IDIV-B.TO's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDIV-B.TO
Manulife Smart International Dividend ETF Unhedged Units
2.80%3.02%3.49%1.73%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF
2.25%2.46%2.12%2.31%2.05%2.06%2.72%2.31%2.27%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDU.TO and IDIV-B.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDU.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDU.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IDIV-B.TO.

XDU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IDIV-B.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XDU.TO and 0.55% for IDIV-B.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDU.TO and IDIV-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer