XDTE vs. QQA
XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XDTE returned 25.78% vs 31.26% for QQA. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
XDTE vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDTE achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.23% return.
XDTE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 31.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDTE vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 9.12% | 12.60% | 8.38% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.23% | 17.24% | 7.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDTE and QQA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XDTE and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDTE vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDTE
QQA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XDTE
QQA
Financial Services
XDTE
QQA
Communication Services
XDTE
QQA
Consumer Cyclical
XDTE
QQA
Healthcare
XDTE
QQA
Industrials
XDTE
QQA
Consumer Defensive
XDTE
QQA
Energy
XDTE
QQA
Utilities
XDTE
QQA
Real Estate
XDTE
QQA
Basic Materials
XDTE
QQA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDTE vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
XDTE
QQA
XDTE vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDTE | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.59 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.42 | 16.10 | -0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDTE | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.50 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
XDTE vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDTE drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, roughly equal to the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDTE and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDTE | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.09% | -19.73% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | -8.76% | +1.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.39% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -2.44% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.95% | -0.27% |
Volatility
XDTE vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) is 2.43%, while Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that XDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDTE | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | 2.93% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 9.68% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 12.59% | -1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 18.25% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 18.25% | -4.41% |
XDTE vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDTE vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.55%, more than QQA's 9.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.32% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 33.55% | 39.16% | 20.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDTE and QQA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQA has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to XDTE (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDTE dropped -19.09% vs QQA's -19.73%.
On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 31.26% vs 25.78% for XDTE. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 31.26% return vs 25.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for XDTE.
XDTE has the higher dividend yield at 33.55%, compared with 9.32% for QQA.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for XDTE and 0.29% for QQA.
QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDTE and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer