XDSQ vs. URSP
XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) and URSP (ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. XDSQ is actively managed, while URSP is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDSQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for URSP.
Performance
XDSQ vs. URSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDSQ achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than URSP's 18.34% return.
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 16.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- —
URSP
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ vs. URSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.84% | 6.27% |
URSP ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 18.34% | 1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDSQ and URSP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDSQ vs. URSP — Risk / Return Rank
XDSQ
URSP
XDSQ vs. URSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (URSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDSQ | URSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDSQ | URSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.16 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
XDSQ vs. URSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDSQ drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, which is greater than URSP's maximum drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSQ and URSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDSQ | URSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.06% | -15.72% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -3.18% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | — | — |
Volatility
XDSQ vs. URSP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDSQ | URSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 23.44% | -12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 23.44% | -8.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 23.44% | -8.35% |
XDSQ vs. URSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than URSP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDSQ vs. URSP - Dividend Comparison
XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
URSP ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 0.58% | 0.38% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDSQ and URSP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URSP.
URSP has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDSQ and 0.95% for URSP.
Find the right allocation for XDSQ and URSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer