PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDSQ vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDSQ vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDSQ achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's 5.58% return.


XDSQ

1D
0.01%
1M
1.59%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.86%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*

BUFF

1D
0.15%
1M
1.62%
YTD
5.58%
6M
6.06%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDSQ vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
2.80%14.22%23.12%23.00%-16.78%12.75%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.58%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XDSQ and BUFF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.90

The correlation between XDSQ and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDSQ vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDSQ
BUFF

Technology

35.7%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.9%

Communication Services

11.3%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.4%

Industrials

8.3%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

XDSQ
35.7%
BUFF
36.2%

Financial Services

XDSQ
11.6%
BUFF
11.9%

Communication Services

XDSQ
11.3%
BUFF
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDSQ
10.2%
BUFF
10.1%

Healthcare

XDSQ
8.5%
BUFF
8.4%

Industrials

XDSQ
8.3%
BUFF
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDSQ
4.9%
BUFF
4.9%

Energy

XDSQ
3.5%
BUFF
3.5%

Utilities

XDSQ
2.4%
BUFF
2.3%

Real Estate

XDSQ
1.9%
BUFF
1.9%

Basic Materials

XDSQ
1.8%
BUFF
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDSQ vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDSQ vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDSQBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.60

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

4.11

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.97

21.95

-13.98

XDSQ vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDSQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDSQ and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDSQBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.86

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.04

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.49

+0.20

Drawdowns

XDSQ vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSQ drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSQ and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDSQBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

-46.23%

+20.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-3.58%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-10.24%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

-10.24%

-15.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-6.18%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.67%

+1.34%

Volatility

XDSQ vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) is 0.57%, while Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that XDSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDSQBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

1.01%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

3.83%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.56%

5.15%

+5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

8.41%

+6.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

17.67%

-2.57%

XDSQ vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDSQ vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDSQ nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDSQ and BUFF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFF has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to XDSQ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDSQ dropped -26.06% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, XDSQ leads with 9.80% vs 8.75% for BUFF. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 9.80% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

XDSQ and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XDSQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDSQ and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDSQ and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer