PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDQQ vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDQQ vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than POCT's 5.56% return.


XDQQ

1D
0.04%
1M
1.17%
YTD
2.62%
6M
2.67%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

POCT

1D
0.22%
1M
1.85%
YTD
5.56%
6M
6.01%
1Y
14.67%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDQQ vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
2.62%13.75%31.47%30.15%-33.74%18.29%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
5.56%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and POCT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.82

The correlation between XDQQ and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDQQ vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDQQ
POCT

Technology

50.7%
36.2%

Communication Services

15.8%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
4.9%

Healthcare

5.1%
8.4%

Industrials

3.3%
8.1%

Utilities

1.6%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.8%

Energy

0.7%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

XDQQ
50.7%
POCT
36.2%

Communication Services

XDQQ
15.8%
POCT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDQQ
12.5%
POCT
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDQQ
8.7%
POCT
4.9%

Healthcare

XDQQ
5.1%
POCT
8.4%

Industrials

XDQQ
3.3%
POCT
8.1%

Utilities

XDQQ
1.6%
POCT
2.3%

Basic Materials

XDQQ
1.3%
POCT
1.8%

Energy

XDQQ
0.7%
POCT
3.5%

Financial Services

XDQQ
0.2%
POCT
11.9%

Real Estate

XDQQ
0.1%
POCT
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDQQ
XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDQQ vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDQQPOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.48

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

3.35

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

17.20

-10.57

XDQQ vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDQQ and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDQQPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.40

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.25

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.88

-0.41

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and POCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDQQPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.63%

-18.80%

-16.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-4.40%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

-10.22%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

-10.22%

-25.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.83%

-1.50%

-9.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

0.86%

+1.74%

Volatility

XDQQ vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) is 0.36%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 0.90%. This indicates that XDQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDQQPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.90%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

4.77%

+6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

6.15%

+7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

7.94%

+11.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

10.22%

+9.43%

XDQQ vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDQQ and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

XDQQ vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDQQ nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDQQ and POCT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POCT has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to XDQQ (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDQQ dropped -35.63% vs POCT's -18.80%.

On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.87% vs 8.32% for XDQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDQQ and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

XDQQ and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XDQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while POCT is Defined Outcome.

POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDQQ and POCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer