XDQQ vs. NIOG

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) and NIOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. XDQQ is actively managed, while NIOG is passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NIOG.

Performance

XDQQ vs. NIOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly higher than NIOG's -30.21% return.

XDQQ

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.79%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 16.55%
• 3Y*: 17.51%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: —

NIOG

• 1D: -7.05%
• 1M: -21.38%
• YTD: -30.21%
• 6M: -25.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDQQ vs. NIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly	2.79%	3.72%
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF	-30.21%	3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and NIOG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. NIOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDQQ

XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 38
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

NIOG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDQQ vs. NIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDQQ	NIOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.38	—	—

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. NIOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, smaller than the maximum NIOG drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and NIOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDQQ	NIOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.63%	-56.27%	+20.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-56.27%	+56.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.71%	-22.75%	+12.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDQQ	NIOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.80%	115.62%	-101.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.80%	115.62%	-95.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.54%	115.62%	-96.08%

XDQQ vs. NIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NIOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDQQ vs. NIOG - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDQQ nor NIOG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDQQ and NIOG in my portfolio?

XDQQ and NIOG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDQQ or NIOG?

On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDQQ or NIOG?

NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDQQ or NIOG?

XDQQ and NIOG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XDQQ and NIOG?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 0.75% for NIOG.