XDQQ vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. XDQQ is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDQQ returned 7.91%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for EINC. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

XDQQ vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.27% return.

XDQQ

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 16.88%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -5.79%
• YTD: 24.27%
• 6M: 25.77%
• 1Y: 27.21%
• 3Y*: 29.77%
• 5Y*: 20.86%
• 10Y*: 11.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDQQ vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly	2.90%	13.75%	31.47%	30.15%	-33.74%	18.52%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	24.27%	7.11%	42.79%	15.55%	19.18%	14.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and EINC is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.29

The correlation between XDQQ and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDQQ vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDQQ	EINC
Technology	50.7%	-
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	-
Healthcare	5.1%	-
Industrials	3.3%	2.5%
Utilities	1.6%	0.6%
Basic Materials	1.3%	-
Energy	0.7%	99.4%
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDQQ

XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 57
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 52
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDQQ vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDQQ	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.82	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.47	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	3.47	-2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	8.82	-2.32

XDQQ vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDQQ and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDQQ	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.63%	-87.55%	+51.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	-7.89%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.17%	-16.01%	-7.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.63%	-19.87%	-15.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.79%	+5.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.73%	-44.16%	+33.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	3.09%	-0.49%

Volatility

XDQQ vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) is 0.63%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that XDQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDQQ	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.63%	6.32%	-5.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	11.86%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.82%	15.07%	-1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.80%	19.54%	+0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.56%	25.43%	-5.87%

XDQQ vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDQQ vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.56%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDQQ and EINC in my portfolio?

XDQQ and EINC have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDQQ or EINC?

EINC has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to XDQQ (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDQQ dropped -35.63% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, XDQQ or EINC?

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 20.86% vs 7.91% for XDQQ. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDQQ or EINC?

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDQQ or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDQQ or EINC?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.

What is the main difference between XDQQ and EINC?

XDQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 0.45% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.