XDQQ vs. AMUU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) and AMUU (Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XDQQ returned 17.22% vs 1076.72% for AMUU. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for AMUU.

Performance

XDQQ vs. AMUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than AMUU's 361.36% return.

XDQQ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 6M: 2.67%
• 1Y: 17.22%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: —

AMUU

• 1D: -6.47%
• 1M: 102.88%
• YTD: 361.36%
• 6M: 344.98%
• 1Y: 1,076.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDQQ vs. AMUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly	2.62%	9.67%
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	361.36%	145.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and AMUU is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.57

The correlation between XDQQ and AMUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDQQ vs. AMUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDQQ	AMUU
Technology	50.7%	100.0%
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	-
Healthcare	5.1%	-
Industrials	3.3%	-
Utilities	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.3%	-
Energy	0.7%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. AMUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDQQ

XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

AMUU

AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDQQ vs. AMUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDQQ	AMUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	8.38	-7.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	4.65	-2.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.61	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	19.33	-17.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	37.88	-31.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDQQ vs. AMUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the AMUU Sharpe Ratio of 8.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDQQ and AMUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDQQ	AMUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	8.38	-7.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	4.16	-3.70

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. AMUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, smaller than the maximum AMUU drawdown of -56.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and AMUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDQQ	AMUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.63%	-56.47%	+20.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	-56.31%	+44.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-6.47%	+6.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.83%	-22.79%	+11.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	28.68%	-26.08%

Volatility

XDQQ vs. AMUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) is 0.36%, while Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) has a volatility of 46.75%. This indicates that XDQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDQQ	AMUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	46.75%	-46.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.10%	94.42%	-83.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.80%	129.86%	-116.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.80%	131.25%	-111.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.65%	131.25%	-111.60%

XDQQ vs. AMUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUU's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDQQ vs. AMUU - Dividend Comparison

XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	3.02%	13.58%
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDQQ and AMUU in my portfolio?

XDQQ and AMUU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDQQ or AMUU?

AMUU has higher volatility (46.75%) compared to XDQQ (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDQQ dropped -35.63% vs AMUU's -56.47%.

Which ETF is better, XDQQ or AMUU?

On 1-year performance, AMUU leads with 1076.72% vs 17.22% for XDQQ. On fees, XDQQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDQQ or AMUU?

Over the 1-year period, AMUU has performed better with a 1076.72% return vs 17.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDQQ or AMUU?

XDQQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for AMUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDQQ or AMUU?

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.

What is the main difference between XDQQ and AMUU?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 0.97% for AMUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.38 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.