XDND.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XDND.DE (Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDND.DE is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI North America High Dividend Yield Index, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDND.DE returned 9.54%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for XDWH.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDND.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
XDND.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDND.DE achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, XDND.DE has outperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of 9.54%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.
XDND.DE
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- YTD
- 15.70%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
XDND.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDND.DE Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc) | 15.70% | 0.21% | 17.37% | 2.26% | 0.85% | 33.35% | -8.47% | 25.76% | -0.21% | 4.27% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 6.77% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 30.30% | 2.70% | 27.21% | 5.98% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDND.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2014 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XDND.DE and XDWH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDND.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDND.DE
XDWH.DE
XDND.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc) (XDND.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDND.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.28 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | 2.24 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.43 | 5.74 | +7.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDND.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDND.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.18%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDND.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDND.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.18% | -40.65% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.92% | -9.82% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.13% | -21.11% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -21.11% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.18% | -26.06% | -6.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.35% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -7.34% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 3.83% | -2.20% |
Volatility
XDND.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc) (XDND.DE) is 2.40%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that XDND.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDND.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 4.52% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 10.23% | -3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 14.17% | -4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 13.51% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 15.62% | +0.45% |
XDND.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDND.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDND.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDND.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDND.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XDND.DE.
XDND.DE is categorized as Dividend, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XDND.DE tracks MSCI North America High Dividend Yield Index, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XDND.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDND.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer